{"id":2831,"date":"2015-12-21T19:19:05","date_gmt":"2015-12-21T19:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201512uberpop-une-pratique-commerciale-trompeuse-confirmee-en-appel-html\/"},"modified":"2018-07-02T20:59:49","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T19:59:49","slug":"201512uberpop-une-pratique-commerciale-trompeuse-confirmee-en-appel-html","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201512uberpop-une-pratique-commerciale-trompeuse-confirmee-en-appel-html\/","title":{"rendered":"Uberpop : une pratique commerciale trompeuse confirm\u00e9e en appel"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\"Uberpop<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Jurisprudences | Cour d'appel de Paris, P\u00f4le 4 – Chambre 10, arr\u00eat du 7 d\u00e9cembre 2015 | Legalis.net<\/a><\/p>\n

consommateur – professionnel – assurance – pratique commerciale trompeuse – activit\u00e9 illicite Prononc\u00e9 publiquement le lundi 7 d\u00e9cembre 2015, par le P\u00f4le 4- Ch.10 des appels correctionnels, Sur…<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4843<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p>\n

Non seulement la cour d\u2019appel de Paris a confirm\u00e9 le jugement du TGI de Paris du 16 octobre 2014 qui avait condamn\u00e9 Uber pour pratique commerciale trompeuse en raison de la pr\u00e9sentation de son service payant de transport de particulier \u00e0 particulier, \u00ab comme licite alors qu\u2019elle ne l\u2019\u00e9tait pas \u00bb, mais elle a ajout\u00e9 deux chefs rejet\u00e9s en premi\u00e8re instance, sur les conditions d\u2019assurance des chauffeurs et sur le statut de particulier ou de professionnel des conducteurs. L\u2019arr\u00eat du 7 d\u00e9cembre 2015 a, en cons\u00e9quence, aggrav\u00e9 l\u2019amende qu\u2019Uber France doit verser, passant de 100 000 \u00e0 150 000 \u20ac. Elle confirme \u00e9galement la publication du dispositif de l\u2019arr\u00eat sur les deux sites d\u2019Uber.<\/p>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Legalis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jurisprudences | Cour d'appel de Paris, P\u00f4le 4 – Chambre 10, arr\u00eat du 7 d\u00e9cembre 2015 | Legalis.net consommateur – professionnel – assurance – pratique commerciale trompeuse – activit\u00e9 illicite Prononc\u00e9 publiquement le lundi 7 d\u00e9cembre 2015, par le P\u00f4le 4- Ch.10 des appels correctionnels, Sur… http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4843 Non seulement la cour d\u2019appel de Paris a
Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2831"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2831"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3566,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2831\/revisions\/3566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}