{"id":2830,"date":"2015-12-22T13:52:25","date_gmt":"2015-12-22T13:52:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201512diffamation-pas-d-interruption-de-la-prescription-sans-acte-de-procedure-regulier-html\/"},"modified":"2018-07-02T21:00:34","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T20:00:34","slug":"201512diffamation-pas-d-interruption-de-la-prescription-sans-acte-de-procedure-regulier-html","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201512diffamation-pas-d-interruption-de-la-prescription-sans-acte-de-procedure-regulier-html\/","title":{"rendered":"Diffamation : pas d\u2019interruption de la prescription sans acte de proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9gulier"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\"Diffamation<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Jurisprudences | Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 17\u00e8me Chambre – Presse-civile, jugement du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2015 | Legalis.net<\/a><\/p>\n

L’actualit\u00e9 du droit des nouvelles technologies<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4845<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p>\n

Cette affaire concernant le site lesinrocks.com illustre \u00e0 nouveau la technicit\u00e9 de l\u2019action en diffamation. L\u2019envoi de conclusions par le demandeur alors que le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pas encore d\u2019avocat constitu\u00e9 n\u2019est pas consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un acte de proc\u00e9dure de nature \u00e0 interrompre la prescription, a rappel\u00e9 le TGI de Paris dans un jugement du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2015. L\u2019action en diffamation introduite contre l\u2019\u00e9diteur du site lesinrocks.com est donc prescrite ; cinq mois s\u2019\u00e9tant \u00e9coul\u00e9s entre la requ\u00eate et les plaidoiries.<\/p>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Legalis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jurisprudences | Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, 17\u00e8me Chambre – Presse-civile, jugement du 16 d\u00e9cembre 2015 | Legalis.net L’actualit\u00e9 du droit des nouvelles technologies http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4845 Cette affaire concernant le site lesinrocks.com illustre \u00e0 nouveau la technicit\u00e9 de l\u2019action en diffamation. L\u2019envoi de conclusions par le demandeur alors que le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pas encore d\u2019avocat
Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2830"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3567,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2830\/revisions\/3567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2830"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2830"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2830"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}