{"id":2829,"date":"2015-12-23T14:35:59","date_gmt":"2015-12-23T14:35:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/dr-martens-weston-l-utilisation-d-une-marque-comme-reference-est-une-contrefacon\/"},"modified":"2018-07-02T20:45:58","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T19:45:58","slug":"dr-martens-weston-l-utilisation-d-une-marque-comme-reference-est-une-contrefacon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/dr-martens-weston-l-utilisation-d-une-marque-comme-reference-est-une-contrefacon\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr Martens \/ Weston : l\u2019utilisation d\u2019une marque comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence est une contrefa\u00e7on"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ob-sections\">\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-images ob-default\">\n<div class=\"ob-row-1-col\"><a href=\"http:\/\/img.over-blog-kiwi.com\/0\/97\/03\/42\/obpicKDxYBl.jpeg\" class=\"ob-link-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img.over-blog-kiwi.com\/0\/97\/03\/42\/obpicKDxYBl.jpeg\" alt=\"Dr Martens \/ Weston : l\u2019utilisation d\u2019une marque comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence est une contrefa\u00e7on\" class=\"ob-cell ob-img ob-media\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-quote\">\n<blockquote class=\"ob-quote\" cite=\"http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=breves-article&#038;id_article=4848\"><p><svg class=\"ob-quote-left\" width=\"25px\" height=\"24px\" viewBox=\"0 0 25 24\" ><path\n                d=\"M0.145536,21.327864 C0.145536,22.452232 1.088732,23.363128 2.253256,23.363128 L9.103694,23.363128 C10.268276,23.363128 11.211588,22.452232 11.211588,21.327864 L11.211588,13.187312 C11.211588,12.062888 10.268276,11.15216 9.103694,11.15216 L5.72067,11.15216 C5.135508,11.15216 4.66681,10.694248 4.66681,10.13464 C4.66681,9.951464 4.71408,9.824288 4.71408,9.824288 C5.483392,7.361576 7.42761,5.387576 9.920276,4.512576 L9.930716,4.502384 C10.684542,4.192144 11.21153,3.469464 11.21153,2.629912 C11.21153,1.5056 10.268218,0.594816 9.103636,0.594816 C8.819088,0.594816 8.550548,0.650704 8.303004,0.747304 L8.207652,0.783144 C3.49144,2.55868 0.145536,6.9852 0.145536,12.16968 L0.145536,21.327864 L0.145536,21.327864 Z M13.84647,21.327864 C13.84647,22.452232 14.789666,23.363128 15.954248,23.363128 L22.804744,23.363128 C23.969268,23.363128 24.912464,22.452232 24.912464,21.327864 L24.912464,13.187312 C24.912464,12.062888 23.969268,11.15216 22.804744,11.15216 L19.421604,11.15216 C18.8365,11.15216 18.367802,10.694248 18.367802,10.13464 C18.367802,9.946368 18.414956,9.824288 18.414956,9.824288 C19.184442,7.361576 21.128602,5.387576 23.621326,4.512576 L23.631766,4.502384 C24.385476,4.192144 24.912464,3.469464 24.912464,2.629912 C24.912464,1.5056 23.969268,0.594816 22.804744,0.594816 C22.520196,0.594816 22.25154,0.650704 22.004054,0.747304 L21.908702,0.783144 C17.192374,2.55868 13.84647,6.9852 13.84647,12.16968 L13.84647,21.327864 L13.84647,21.327864 Z\"><\/path><\/svg><\/p>\n<p>Pour la cour d\u2019appel de Paris, l\u2019utilisation de la marque Weston comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence d\u2019une paire de chaussures de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Dr Martens sur son site internet constitue une contrefa\u00e7on de marque. Dans son arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2015, la cour a ainsi infirm\u00e9 le jugement du TGI de Paris en condamnant les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s Airwair International et Dr Martens E-commerce \u00e0 payer 20 000 \u20ac en r\u00e9paration des actes de contrefa\u00e7on de marque et 15 000 \u20ac au titre de la concurrence d\u00e9loyale. JM Weston, le fabricant de chaussures haut de gamme pour hommes, avait constat\u00e9 la commercialisation de chaussures Dr Martens sous la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence Weston sur le site internet drmartens.com, \u00e0 destination d\u2019un public fran\u00e7ais. Le signe \u00e9tait reproduit \u00e0 l\u2019identique pour d\u00e9signer des produits similaires. Or, JM Weston est une marque verbale fran\u00e7aise d\u00e9pos\u00e9e en classe 25, d\u00e9signant les \u00ab chaussures en tout genre \u00bb. La cour a estim\u00e9 que l\u2019utilisation du signe Weston pour des produits identiques \u00e0 ceux de l\u2019enregistrement de la marque porte atteinte \u00e0 la fonction d\u2019origine de la marque, sans qu\u2019il y ait \u00e0 \u00e9tablir de risque de confusion entre les produits. La contrefa\u00e7on par reproduction est donc caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e, contrairement \u00e0 ce qu\u2019avait jug\u00e9 le TGI.<\/p>\n<p><svg class=\"ob-quote-right\" width=\"25px\" height=\"24px\" viewBox=\"0 0 25 24\" ><path\n                d=\"M0.145536,21.327864 C0.145536,22.452232 1.088732,23.363128 2.253256,23.363128 L9.103694,23.363128 C10.268276,23.363128 11.211588,22.452232 11.211588,21.327864 L11.211588,13.187312 C11.211588,12.062888 10.268276,11.15216 9.103694,11.15216 L5.72067,11.15216 C5.135508,11.15216 4.66681,10.694248 4.66681,10.13464 C4.66681,9.951464 4.71408,9.824288 4.71408,9.824288 C5.483392,7.361576 7.42761,5.387576 9.920276,4.512576 L9.930716,4.502384 C10.684542,4.192144 11.21153,3.469464 11.21153,2.629912 C11.21153,1.5056 10.268218,0.594816 9.103636,0.594816 C8.819088,0.594816 8.550548,0.650704 8.303004,0.747304 L8.207652,0.783144 C3.49144,2.55868 0.145536,6.9852 0.145536,12.16968 L0.145536,21.327864 L0.145536,21.327864 Z M13.84647,21.327864 C13.84647,22.452232 14.789666,23.363128 15.954248,23.363128 L22.804744,23.363128 C23.969268,23.363128 24.912464,22.452232 24.912464,21.327864 L24.912464,13.187312 C24.912464,12.062888 23.969268,11.15216 22.804744,11.15216 L19.421604,11.15216 C18.8365,11.15216 18.367802,10.694248 18.367802,10.13464 C18.367802,9.946368 18.414956,9.824288 18.414956,9.824288 C19.184442,7.361576 21.128602,5.387576 23.621326,4.512576 L23.631766,4.502384 C24.385476,4.192144 24.912464,3.469464 24.912464,2.629912 C24.912464,1.5056 23.969268,0.594816 22.804744,0.594816 C22.520196,0.594816 22.25154,0.650704 22.004054,0.747304 L21.908702,0.783144 C17.192374,2.55868 13.84647,6.9852 13.84647,12.16968 L13.84647,21.327864 L13.84647,21.327864 Z\"\n                transform=\"scale(-1,1) translate(-25)\"><\/path><\/svg><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p class=\"ob-author\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=breves-article&#038;id_article=4848\" class=\"ob-link\" target=\"_blank\">Legalis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-link\">\n<div class=\"ob-ctn \">\n<p class=\"ob-title\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&#038;id_article=4847\" class=\"ob-link\" target=\"_blank\">Jurisprudences | Cour d&#039;appel de Paris, P\u00f4le 5 &#8211; Chambre 2, arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2015 | Legalis.net<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ob-snippet\">L&#8217;actualit\u00e9 du droit des nouvelles technologies<\/p>\n<p class=\"ob-url\"><a class=\"ob-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&#038;id_article=4847\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&#038;id_article=4847<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pour la cour d\u2019appel de Paris, l\u2019utilisation de la marque Weston comme r\u00e9f\u00e9rence d\u2019une paire de chaussures de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Dr Martens sur son site internet constitue une contrefa\u00e7on de marque. Dans son arr\u00eat du 25 septembre 2015, la cour a ainsi infirm\u00e9 le jugement du TGI de Paris en condamnant les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s Airwair International<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/dr-martens-weston-l-utilisation-d-une-marque-comme-reference-est-une-contrefacon\/\" class=\"more\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2829"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2829"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2829\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3553,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2829\/revisions\/3553"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}