{"id":2820,"date":"2016-02-25T08:27:20","date_gmt":"2016-02-25T08:27:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201602la-clause-des-cgu-de-facebook-imposant-un-tribunal-californien-est-abusive-html\/"},"modified":"2018-07-02T20:55:20","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T19:55:20","slug":"201602la-clause-des-cgu-de-facebook-imposant-un-tribunal-californien-est-abusive-html","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/201602la-clause-des-cgu-de-facebook-imposant-un-tribunal-californien-est-abusive-html\/","title":{"rendered":"La clause des CGU de Facebook imposant un tribunal californien est abusive"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p>\n

La cour d\u2019appel de Paris a confirm\u00e9 l\u2019ordonnance du TGI de Paris du 5 mars 2015 qui avait jug\u00e9 que la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence au profit des tribunaux du comt\u00e9 de Santa Clara en Californie, figurant dans les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de Facebook, constituait une clause abusive. <\/p>\n

Dans son arr\u00eat du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2016, la cour conclut que cette clause est r\u00e9put\u00e9e nulle et non \u00e9crite. <\/p>\n

En cons\u00e9quence, le TGI de Paris est comp\u00e9tent pour juger le litige qui oppose le r\u00e9seau social \u00e0 un internaute qui avait vu son compte d\u00e9sactiv\u00e9 apr\u00e8s la mise en ligne de la reproduction du tableau de Courbet \u00ab L\u2019origine du monde \u00bb.<\/p>\n

En savoir plus sur: http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=breves-article&id_article=4908 <\/p>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Legalis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Jurisprudences | Cour d'appel de Paris, P\u00f4le 2 – Chambre 2, arr\u00eat du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2016 | Legalis.net<\/a><\/p>\n

consommateur – clause abusive – professionnel – annulation – conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales d’utilisation – r\u00e9seaux sociaux – compte – clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence – d\u00e9sactivation de compte D\u00e9cisio…<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4907<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"La<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La cour d\u2019appel de Paris a confirm\u00e9 l\u2019ordonnance du TGI de Paris du 5 mars 2015 qui avait jug\u00e9 que la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence au profit des tribunaux du comt\u00e9 de Santa Clara en Californie, figurant dans les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de Facebook, constituait une clause abusive. Dans son arr\u00eat du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2016, la
Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[611],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2820"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2820"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2820\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3561,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2820\/revisions\/3561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}