{"id":2816,"date":"2016-04-01T12:28:18","date_gmt":"2016-04-01T11:28:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/20160434-publications-cyber-harcelement-html\/"},"modified":"2018-07-02T20:50:32","modified_gmt":"2018-07-02T19:50:32","slug":"20160434-publications-cyber-harcelement-html","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/20160434-publications-cyber-harcelement-html\/","title":{"rendered":"34 publications = cyber-harc\u00e8lement"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p>\n

Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du TGI de Paris a estim\u00e9 que la diffusion r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9e de 34 articles contre un couple caract\u00e9risait le d\u00e9lit de cyber-harc\u00e8lement, cr\u00e9\u00e9 par la loi du 4 ao\u00fbt 2014 et introduit dans l\u2019article 222-333-2-2 4 \u00b0 du code p\u00e9nal. <\/p>\n

Dans son ordonnance du 29 mars 2016, le tribunal a pris en consid\u00e9ration le nombre de publications et la teneur des textes en cause qui nuisent \u00e0 la r\u00e9putation des deux personnes concern\u00e9es pour juger qu\u2019il y avait un trouble manifestement illicite. Il a list\u00e9 les url de chacun des articles et a ordonn\u00e9 leur retrait.<\/p>\n

Lire la suite sur: http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=breves-article&id_article=4952<\/p>\n

<\/path><\/svg><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Legalis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Jurisprudences | Tribunal de grande instance de Paris, ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 29 mars 2016 | Legalis.net<\/a><\/p>\n

p\u00e9nal – harc\u00e8lement – contenu manifestement illicite – messages – e-r\u00e9putation – articles – r\u00e9putation – cyber-harc\u00e8lement A l’audience du 08 mars 2016, tenue publiquement, pr\u00e9sid\u00e9e par Mari…<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.legalis.net\/spip.php?page=jurisprudence-decision&id_article=4951<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\"34<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du TGI de Paris a estim\u00e9 que la diffusion r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9e de 34 articles contre un couple caract\u00e9risait le d\u00e9lit de cyber-harc\u00e8lement, cr\u00e9\u00e9 par la loi du 4 ao\u00fbt 2014 et introduit dans l\u2019article 222-333-2-2 4 \u00b0 du code p\u00e9nal. Dans son ordonnance du 29 mars 2016, le tribunal a pris en
Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[608,609],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2816"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2816"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3559,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2816\/revisions\/3559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}