{"id":2798,"date":"2016-06-30T19:41:01","date_gmt":"2016-06-30T17:41:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/rejet-d-une-action-en-contrefacon-l-action-en-concurrence-deloyale-reste-ouverte-y-compris-concernant-des-faits-identiques\/"},"modified":"2016-12-12T11:16:35","modified_gmt":"2016-12-12T10:16:35","slug":"rejet-d-une-action-en-contrefacon-l-action-en-concurrence-deloyale-reste-ouverte-y-compris-concernant-des-faits-identiques","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/rejet-d-une-action-en-contrefacon-l-action-en-concurrence-deloyale-reste-ouverte-y-compris-concernant-des-faits-identiques\/","title":{"rendered":"Rejet d&#8217;une action en contrefa\u00e7on: l&#8217;action en concurrence d\u00e9loyale reste ouverte y compris concernant des faits identiques"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"ob-sections\">\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-text\">\n<div class=\"ob-text\">\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 7 juin 2016, la cour de cassation a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que l&#039;action en concurrence d\u00e9loyale, qui est ouverte \u00e0 celui qui ne peut se pr\u00e9valoir d&#039;aucun droit privatif, peut se fonder sur des faits mat\u00e9riellement identiques \u00e0 ceux all\u00e9gu\u00e9s au soutien d&#039;une action en contrefa\u00e7on rejet\u00e9e pour d\u00e9faut de constitution de droit privatif, d\u00e8s lors qu&#039;il est justifi\u00e9 d&#039;un comportement fautif au sens de l&#039;article 1382 du code civil.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-link\">\n<div class=\"ob-ctn \">\n<p class=\"ob-title\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000032687455&#038;fastReqId=703638193&#038;fastPos=1\" class=\"ob-link\" target=\"_blank\">Cour de cassation, civile, Chambre commerciale, 7 juin 2016, 14-26.950, In\u00e9dit | Legifrance<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ob-snippet\">Cour de cassation chambre commerciale Audience publique du mardi 7 juin 2016 N\u00b0 de pourvoi: 14-26950 Non publi\u00e9 au bulletin Cassation partielle Mme Mouillard (pr\u00e9sident), pr\u00e9sident Me Bertrand, SCP H\u00e9mery et Thomas-Raquin, avocat(s) REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, a rendu l&#8217;arr\u00eat suivant<\/p>\n<p class=\"ob-url\"><a class=\"ob-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000032687455&#038;fastReqId=703638193&#038;fastPos=1\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichJuriJudi.do?oldAction=rechJuriJudi&#038;idTexte=JURITEXT000032687455&#038;fastReqId=703638193&#038;fastPos=1<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ob-section ob-section-images ob-default\">\n<div class=\"ob-row-1-col\"><a href=\"http:\/\/img.over-blog-kiwi.com\/0\/97\/03\/42\/obpiczTvEM6.jpeg\" class=\"ob-link-img\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img.over-blog-kiwi.com\/0\/97\/03\/42\/obpiczTvEM6.jpeg\" alt=\"Rejet d&#x27;une action en contrefa\u00e7on: l&#x27;action en concurrence d\u00e9loyale reste ouverte y compris concernant des faits identiques \" class=\"ob-cell ob-img ob-media\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 7 juin 2016, la cour de cassation a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que l&#039;action en concurrence d\u00e9loyale, qui est ouverte \u00e0 celui qui ne peut se pr\u00e9valoir d&#039;aucun droit privatif, peut se fonder sur des faits mat\u00e9riellement identiques \u00e0 ceux all\u00e9gu\u00e9s au soutien d&#039;une action en contrefa\u00e7on rejet\u00e9e pour d\u00e9faut de constitution de droit<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/rejet-d-une-action-en-contrefacon-l-action-en-concurrence-deloyale-reste-ouverte-y-compris-concernant-des-faits-identiques\/\" class=\"more\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[43,44,45],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2856,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2798\/revisions\/2856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/h2o-avocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}